<![CDATA[Series 9]]>Had there been a series 9 in 1995 what might it have been like?

Similar to series 8? Totally different? Improved graphics and special effects?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't sometime early in 95 when THEY decided not to make another series. If that was the case then is it possible that any new dungeon rooms or effects had been worked before THEY decided to give Knightmare the AXE (or SWORD perhaps).

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/topic/1053/series-9RSS for NodeSun, 13 Sep 2026 06:21:57 GMTWed, 12 May 2004 14:27:42 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Series 9 on Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:44:00 GMT]]>I really hope it isn't on every day. I don't think it would have enough mass appeal to be shown daily - despite its quality. A daily showing might kill it, for two reasons: 1) Over-showing could make the audience grow tired of it, as you say.

  1. Daily live shows might seem hurriedly put together, marring the quality of what SHOULD be an awesome programme.

I doubt Knightmare VR will be anything more than a cult show, and that's how it should be. I would like, half an hour of unbroken questing, once a week (Friday evening, ideally), 16-25 episodes per series.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25783https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25783Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:44:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Series 9 on Sat, 12 Jun 2004 13:02:28 GMT]]>The dosage of the new series is critical, I think. I would imagine, though, that if the new series is live then episodes will be shown daily. The slight danger here is of overkill but I'm sure that will be looked into closely - if it hasn't already.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25742https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25742Sat, 12 Jun 2004 13:02:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Series 9 on Fri, 11 Jun 2004 20:23:45 GMT]]>Although if BBC2 get it (here's hoping) then There wont be any breaks halfway, including loan ones. Also everyone who has access to a tv can watch it.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25716https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25716Fri, 11 Jun 2004 20:23:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Series 9 on Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:01:53 GMT]]>I think 30 minutes (minus adverts) would be a nice time for a episode. The problem is that there are more adverts than programs on telly these days. If I could have one thing my way it would be not to have the eps split up by adverts halfway through - who wants the tension shattered by Insurance Claims ads? 😕

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25706https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25706Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:01:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Series 9 on Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:54:53 GMT]]>Well I heard this via 'mysteria' in the by-passing levels thread (if I can remember the correct thread).

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25701https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25701Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:54:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Series 9 on Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:38:06 GMT]]>

There was rumours that the short-cut may have become a permenant feature and a new level 4 introduced.

If there really were any such rumours (and I certainly haven't heard them before), then rumours are all they were. There were no developments for season 9 at all, not even any new concept work.

I disagree that Knightmare should have lasted an hour per episode. It would start to grate. Maybe the occasional 45-minute special e.g. at the start and end of seasons. But most episodes were about 25 minutes, and that was enough of a fix while still leaving us wanting more.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25700https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25700Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:38:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Series 9 on Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:09:30 GMT]]>twenty minutes was just too short for the programme, was over in no time. 45 minutes would be ok but an hour mybe too long. but to do that would need it to come away totally from citv and cbbc and appeal to us golden oldies. I could live with that. Be interesting to see how it will be kept challeging to go on that long.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25699https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25699Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:09:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Series 9 on Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:00:06 GMT]]>Sounds good, but it would take too long. Hour length episodes would be good for that, in fact they'd be good anyway. I realise of course that this could never have been becasue of the time restrictions and sechedualling on ITV.

Does anyone else thaink that Knightmare would have been better if it went on for an hour.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25697https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25697Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:00:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Series 9 on Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:58:55 GMT]]>with the sound of thing Tim Child or whoever designs the levels did not idea of Goth being repeated. But they have repeated level designs before, just not usually moved ip up or down a level. Season 4 is exception where the encounter with Mogdred and Mellisandre after the bridge seemed to moved bewteen level 2 and 3 within the seris.

But i seem to find Goth harder than Marbleheard and Linghorn. Or is that just me?

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25696https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25696Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:58:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Series 9 on Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:54:35 GMT]]>Also a fair bit of in-fighting as to which is the more superior magician.

There was rumours that the short-cut may have become a permenant feature and a new level 4 introduced. So good teams would have 3 levels to complete, but not so good teams would have to complete 4 levels.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25695https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25695Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:54:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Series 9 on Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:43:02 GMT]]>What they may have done in carrying on the them is possibly made Goth level 1, Linghorn and Marblehead level two and goodness knows what seris 3 could have been- a return to Mount Fear perhaps? Maybe even have two leaders of opposition. Mogdread and Fear working together. Imagine how hard the dungeon would be then?

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25693https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25693Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:43:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Series 9 on Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:29:23 GMT]]>I agree KM needs a jester, but I was sick of Motley by S6. They should've intvented a new one who could actually TELL A JOKE.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25690https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25690Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:29:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Series 9 on Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:48:36 GMT]]>I wouldn't have liked to have seen Motley replaced - the Dungeon isn't the same without a jester, imo.

Perhaps a series 9 in 1995 might have looked like a cross between series 8 and the series currently in development, with a still-blindfolded Dungeoneer. I also think that most of the characters would have carried over.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25674https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25674Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:48:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Series 9 on Fri, 11 Jun 2004 01:35:06 GMT]]>I would have liked to have seen an extended S8, really. Full of potential yet let down by timing.

Most of the characters would have carried over, I imagine. I have so many ideas on the season, I don't know where to start! Is where most of the RPG gets created from I guess!

I do feel, however, Motley could have done with a replacement for S9. As the interview states, they tried ideas, but it never seemed to work...

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25666https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25666Fri, 11 Jun 2004 01:35:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Series 9 on Thu, 10 Jun 2004 22:32:49 GMT]]>Supposing there had been a series 9 in 1995 what characters would people have prefered to be retained or even re-introduced from earlier series?

Remember that Ariadne was re-introduced in series 4 and Motley was re-introduced in series 8 so it can't be ruled out.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25664https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/25664Thu, 10 Jun 2004 22:32:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Series 9 on Wed, 12 May 2004 15:18:36 GMT]]>When BVA's demonstrator is rolled out, Pendragon may well get his answer.

Maybe not S9... but a similar set-up built by the same talented people?!?

rubs paws together in unabashed glee

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23162https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23162Wed, 12 May 2004 15:18:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Series 9 on Wed, 12 May 2004 15:14:58 GMT]]>Pendragon, the interview is up in the news archive on the main page, it explains S9 was barely thought of.

S9 would have been very interesting, I can only hope that one of the improvements would have been Reach, maybe actually have it interctive as opposed to computer controlled?

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23159https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23159Wed, 12 May 2004 15:14:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Series 9 on Wed, 12 May 2004 14:56:15 GMT]]>

Based on the developments between other series, what do you think it would've been like if there had been a series 9

Now there's an interesting one!

Hopefully an improvement in the CGI (after being weaned on David Rowe, the Computer graphics looked crap in comparison).

A working VR 'H of J'.

The production getting ever-more seamless between rooms (no/less interrupted gameplay to set up rooms during filming).

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23152https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23152Wed, 12 May 2004 14:56:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Series 9 on Wed, 12 May 2004 14:40:12 GMT]]>Based on the developments between other series, what do you think it would've been like if there had been a series 9

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23147https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23147Wed, 12 May 2004 14:40:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Series 9 on Wed, 12 May 2004 14:37:06 GMT]]>According to the interview that Tim Child gave Kieran O'Brien in the New Year, NO development of any kind was started on S9. They already knew before that that the season was not going to run.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23145https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23145Wed, 12 May 2004 14:37:06 GMT