<![CDATA[Oh dear. Not again!!!]]>Oh dear it appears that the main site firstly exceeded it's bandwidth and now seems to be appearing in funny colours, minus the images. I suppose it's going back to normal though!

ps I just refreshed and it says about the bandwidth again . The site be highly popular lately then .

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/topic/1065/oh-dear.-not-againRSS for NodeTue, 15 Sep 2026 10:54:06 GMTThu, 13 May 2004 18:06:05 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Oh dear. Not again!!! on Sun, 16 May 2004 21:08:02 GMT]]>

Anyway, I am in the process of buying and feeding the site some more bandwidth, which will hopefully last it until dinner time.

Easy line to reply with here...

"I hunger....feed me bandwidth!"

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23678https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23678Sun, 16 May 2004 21:08:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oh dear. Not again!!! on Sat, 15 May 2004 14:18:42 GMT]]>Indeed, having Km's profile raised significantly by being broadcast once more can only be a good thing when there's a possible new series in the works.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23577https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23577Sat, 15 May 2004 14:18:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oh dear. Not again!!! on Sat, 15 May 2004 11:39:48 GMT]]>Snice the site has gone down again and the forum is gaining more and more members almost every month.

This must mean that Knightmare is becoming popular once again.

And with Knightmare VR (Series 9) in the making this will be... brillant, oh sorry long word for those who didn't understand, good.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23569https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23569Sat, 15 May 2004 11:39:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oh dear. Not again!!! on Sat, 15 May 2004 11:32:49 GMT]]>Thanks tis nice to be back!!

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23568https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23568Sat, 15 May 2004 11:32:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oh dear. Not again!!! on Fri, 14 May 2004 21:43:11 GMT]]>Indeed! Been a lot of new members recently, I reckon we'll have hit 600 by late July, perhaps.

Nice to see you posting here again Debz, has been along time.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23518https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23518Fri, 14 May 2004 21:43:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oh dear. Not again!!! on Fri, 14 May 2004 17:56:15 GMT]]>Yay, good knews there. Anyway welcome back from ones Deb to another Debz . No probs about you or anyone coming back. It's great that the site has been exceedingly popular lately and also that there has been several knew members registered here in the past couple of weeks.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23449https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23449Fri, 14 May 2004 17:56:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oh dear. Not again!!! on Thu, 13 May 2004 22:55:52 GMT]]>well done Nic

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23356https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23356Thu, 13 May 2004 22:55:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oh dear. Not again!!! on Thu, 13 May 2004 21:29:46 GMT]]>It is indeed the bandwidth problem again, and pronably would have never been a problem if it were last year. The site is currently at it's busiest ever, no doubt as a result of the combination of Knightmare on Challenge and knews of the knew Knightmare spreading.

Anyway, I am in the process of buying and feeding the site some more bandwidth, which will hopefully last it until dinner time.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23346https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23346Thu, 13 May 2004 21:29:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oh dear. Not again!!! on Thu, 13 May 2004 21:11:23 GMT]]>Must be my fault...I come back and the site goes down!!

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23340https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/23340Thu, 13 May 2004 21:11:23 GMT