<![CDATA[Re:Channel 5]]>Got thinking if we wanted new episodes of Knightmare surely Channel 5 would be the best bet.

They are always up for new ideas and could aim it at both adults and children.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/topic/933/re-channel-5RSS for NodeSun, 13 Sep 2026 05:35:38 GMTWed, 24 Mar 2004 00:14:03 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:19:28 GMT]]>I don't want Knightmare on C5, put it on a BBC Channel where there's no adverts.. Aussie soap Neighbours is now on C5 and is IMO ruined by advert breaks in the middle.. I don't want my perving at the gorgeous Jane "Rebecca" Hall to be broken by ad breaks!

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/39567https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/39567Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:19:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Fri, 10 Sep 2010 06:47:44 GMT]]>The show in question Brooks, is "Night Fever". And whilst it may have been embroiled in controversy, can I just say....

....BRAINTEASER!

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/39372https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/39372Fri, 10 Sep 2010 06:47:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Mon, 06 Sep 2010 22:23:13 GMT]]>

Channel 5 can kiss my arse, I still haven't forgiven them for cancelling that Karaoke thing they had on Saturday nights in the late 90s, that and the advert breaks during Neighbours.

Was that the show hosted by Suggs from Madness and had a bloke in a Monkey costume? I remember that. I can't forgive Channel 5 for killing off "Robot Wars" and also for not repeating "Fort Boyard".

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/39363https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/39363Mon, 06 Sep 2010 22:23:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:37:14 GMT]]>Channel 5 can kiss my arse, I still haven't forgiven them for cancelling that Karaoke thing they had on Saturday nights in the late 90s, that and the advert breaks during Neighbours.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/39361https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/39361Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:37:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Wed, 09 May 2007 19:35:53 GMT]]>BBC have Raven, now they have a fake Knightmare they don't need a real one.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/35677https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/35677Wed, 09 May 2007 19:35:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:59:55 GMT]]>Channel 5 have taken off all their gameshows, whether they use premier rate phone calls or not, due to one slip-up on Brainteaser! That's not very fair!

How about ITV? After all, they are showing a one-off Tiswas and may be showing an adult Fun House!

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/35516https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/35516Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:59:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Mon, 16 Oct 2006 08:32:36 GMT]]>Would be a good idea, although depends how far ahead they have planned shcedules? KM after the Simpsons would be a good schedule maybe (have a cartoon on that kids would watch and followed straight into Knightmare). Without an advert break like it would have had on ITV it would only be about 20-25 minutes though (although 2 Episodes would be about 45 minutes so maybe 2 back to backs?)

Interesting idea though...... Also if back on BBC would give a better chance for a new series to be made

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/34981https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/34981Mon, 16 Oct 2006 08:32:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:01:10 GMT]]>Tim should try the BBC for a late Friday afternoon slot ASAP.

Why??

As soon as I heard about a Robin Hood series to be shown I immediately thought to myself KM has a chance at this time, cos if a series based on the early medieval era is going to be given a lengthy run it indicates the BBC moving away from modern day celebrity/reality drivel to more imaginative programmes. KM would fit this new strategy perfectly.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/34979https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/34979Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:01:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:38:46 GMT]]>I think it should return 2 ITV... ...But that's probably more impractical than Channel 5

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/29550https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/29550Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:38:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Thu, 17 Jun 2004 00:00:35 GMT]]>cant have kinghtmare on channel 5 or 4. definatly the 6pm or 6.45 timeslot and give it either a full halve hour or fourty mintues. put it next to time commanders as that was a good show. Knightmare was definatly more scary int he sutumn months just before christmas. be like old times, except different.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/26006https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/26006Thu, 17 Jun 2004 00:00:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Tue, 01 Jun 2004 19:12:36 GMT]]>One thing that Knightmare has that virtually no other programme has is that it always ends on a cliffhanger. It has a unique formula with which to snare a viewer.

Watchers always want to know what happens, and that was probably one of the main reasons people tuned into it to begin with.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24952https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24952Tue, 01 Jun 2004 19:12:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Mon, 31 May 2004 19:43:25 GMT]]>And, if anything, Knightmare would keep its viewers more as its a serial - not stand alone episodes. People start to get involved. I think that the time is perfect. Knightmare back on dark, Friday nights in the run up to winter. BBC 2 has a pedigree with this sort of show plus the audience share would be high; the younger viewers would watch as it would be plugged on CBBC and all us veterans would watch too

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24905https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24905Mon, 31 May 2004 19:43:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Mon, 31 May 2004 19:38:46 GMT]]>The slot's regularly been used for Robot Wars and Time Commanders in recent years, so I'd say Knightmare fits the precedents nicely.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24903https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24903Mon, 31 May 2004 19:38:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Mon, 31 May 2004 19:34:34 GMT]]>Do you really think Knightmare is suitable for BBC2's 6-7.30pm slot? Because I don't...

The thing with The Simpsons, or Star Trek, or Buffy is that people will keep watching it, even when it's been shown so many times before...

With Knightmare, you'd get decent ratings the first time, and then I guess it would tail off...

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24902https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24902Mon, 31 May 2004 19:34:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Mon, 31 May 2004 09:07:32 GMT]]>BBC 2 will be looking to rebuild their 6pm slot after loing The Simpsons, Robot Wars and Star Trek.

"6-Mania" on Beeb 2 used to be the best hour on TV everynight and Knightmare could be the flagship show they need to start rebuilding

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24867https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24867Mon, 31 May 2004 09:07:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Mon, 31 May 2004 02:47:23 GMT]]>If it does go to a terrestial channel, I'd like to see BBC2 pick Knightmare up, because I think it'll be most likely to find a niche there.

It's the alternative channel these days. In my opinion, C4 is rapidly losing greatness. Big Brother is the main instigator.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24865https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24865Mon, 31 May 2004 02:47:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Wed, 26 May 2004 19:38:10 GMT]]>

Indeed. except it's H20, not H20.

D'oh!

Well I did say that I could just about get away with it, didn't necessarily meant that it was the right one though. I'm glad you knew what I meant though anyway . Also I'm glad Malefact knew the mistake I made aswell.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24488https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24488Wed, 26 May 2004 19:38:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Wed, 26 May 2004 13:52:54 GMT]]>

the difference being??

It's just the way it's written. A superscript implies some mathematical quantity being raised to a power. The subscript is used instead to avoid confusion.

H20 means two atoms of hydrogen bonded to one atom of oxygen

H2SO4 is a bit more complicated but the idea is more or less the same, with an atom of sulphur as well.

Hmm, this is the first time I've used YABBC tags. Might use them again when I want to look flash.

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24449https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24449Wed, 26 May 2004 13:52:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Wed, 26 May 2004 13:37:16 GMT]]>LOL!

'Ooooooooh Naaasty!'

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24447https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24447Wed, 26 May 2004 13:37:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Wed, 26 May 2004 13:34:26 GMT]]>"Hydrochloric acid...

Johnny is with us no more,

For what he thought was H20

Was H2SO4."

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24446https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24446Wed, 26 May 2004 13:34:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Wed, 26 May 2004 13:32:11 GMT]]>the difference being??

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24445https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24445Wed, 26 May 2004 13:32:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Tue, 25 May 2004 22:04:20 GMT]]>Indeed. except it's H20, not H20.

D'oh!

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24411https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24411Tue, 25 May 2004 22:04:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Tue, 25 May 2004 17:51:53 GMT]]>

I was useless in Chemistry (Burnt myself with one of those tapers, for crying out loud).

It wasn't a Bunsen Burner then! One of my jumpers go scorched by a couple of knice pupils, who decided to use it to remove a very hot gauze from a tripod. Charming weren't they. So I take it Rothberry weren't the only one who was bad at chemestry then I take it, other than me, who was completely useless at it , I could just about get a way with what H2O is .

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24363https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24363Tue, 25 May 2004 17:51:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Re:Channel 5 on Tue, 25 May 2004 12:22:02 GMT]]>This was always going to be an 'off-topic' that struggled. 'Iony'. I really can't add anything more. but then, I was useless in Chemistry (Burnt myself with one of those tapers, for crying out loud).

]]>https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24314https://www.knightmare.com/forum/post/24314Tue, 25 May 2004 12:22:02 GMT