Page 5 of 6

Re: Knightmare Article*

Posted: 19 Jan 2004, 15:00
by HStorm
Nothing sinister there. It's "older" material. They'd have moved it to the archive after a couple of months, it's common practise.

Re: Knightmare Article*

Posted: 19 Jan 2004, 15:05
by Fidjit
Just hope they've made it a little more friendly...

Re: Knightmare Article*

Posted: 19 Jan 2004, 18:28
by Lord_Bob
Well they have a right to free speech but they can hardly complain when we disagree.

Re: Knightmare Article*

Posted: 19 Jan 2004, 19:45
by GrimaldineGrimwold
Yes, they have a right to say what they like, but if you're going to react so badly when people don't like it, it's not a good sign.

Re: Knightmare Article*

Posted: 20 Jan 2004, 00:10
by andy_w
Dear All,

I am sorry for the message we wrote - we were a little stressed out about various other things at the time of writing and sort of took it out on you.  We really aren't that evil or nasty...or often that arragont... and didn't mean to cause too much offense.   The point we were trying to get across is that the site isn't meant to be serious, and what we stick up there is written because people want to write it.  It was our first edition and yes, okay, we don't have too much practical experience, despite our various university qualifications, in editing and stuff, but we try our best.  Most of the people who write for us have had little or no previous writing experience, so we want to give them a chance to get something 'published'...if that means not ripping it to shreds and rewriting it totally then so be it - therefore with this approach what we upload may not be a beautifully written piece that could win awards and change lives.   Also, as we mentioned, the opinions of the author's who write for us are not the opinions of the society as a whole, so please don't take CryStinkingFish us as a Knightmare hating people. ( even if it was not meant as a Knightmare flame).

Yes, the animation comment was a cheap dig - I fully appreciate how much graphics have evolved over the last twenty years, and yes, Nemo and the skull are incomparable.  The graphics at the time were pretty effective and certainly were good enough for the purpose.  The point was that today, when viewed on Challenge TV, it is a little difficult not to chuckle (without malice I might add) at the way it looks.  And Finally, to be fair, the kids that did go on the show weren't exactly your stereotypical 'cool kid' were they?  I think its sad that kids shows these days aren't anywhere near as challenging as Knightmare, and so attract less intelligent contestants.  The show's players were geeks, but I don't think thats a bad thing - those are the ones who will have gone on to get firsts at Cambridge, no doubt, while Funhouse contestants are probably reading the Sun.

Anyway, hope this clears things up and you don't hate us utterly, we don't want to make enemies...well, not too many anyway :)


Kate + Andy.  

Re: Knightmare Article*

Posted: 20 Jan 2004, 00:22
by MoanaLiza
...The show's players were geeks...
Oi some of those contestants come around here sometimes. (Okay yes talk about living in a glass house, so i'll stop throwing stones now and start boarding up my glass windows!) To be serious though I think articles like that need to be specified that they are a fun poking jibe, and should certainly not be taken seriously.

Re: Knightmare Article*

Posted: 20 Jan 2004, 00:38
by Emii
I thought Tim from the team before Barry's was quite a good-looking geek... :-[

Re: Knightmare Article*

Posted: 20 Jan 2004, 01:04
by MoanaLiza
I thought Tim from the team before Barry's was quite a good-looking geek... :-[
You mean the one on the team before Julie's, with the interesting t-shirt. I agree about him being good looking. Just looking through some of the guides from s5 onwards I don't think that two of the advisors (the two dark haired ones can't remember whos who name wise) from t6 s5, aren't too bad either!

Re: Knightmare Article*

Posted: 20 Jan 2004, 11:23
by Fidjit
RESOLVED!

Re: Knightmare Article*

Posted: 20 Jan 2004, 21:11
by Emii
Thats the one! The one in the cool T shirt!

And thank you for the explanation and apology, andy_w.

Re: Knightmare Article*

Posted: 21 Jan 2004, 15:09
by Fidjit
RESOLVED!  ;)

Re: Knightmare Article*

Posted: 22 Jan 2004, 01:22
by GrimaldineGrimwold
I seem to remember you and a few other female members defending his shirt from my attacks a while back. Something tells me you weren't really looking at the shirt, however. ;)

Re: Knightmare Article*

Posted: 22 Jan 2004, 01:28
by Skarkill
I know that after my comments on the cloths of Motley and Colin Baker this is going to sound SOOOOO Hypacritiacal



BUT


I rather like that lads shirt (assumeing you meen the Tie-Dyed one) can't say much for its owners looks but thats beside the point.  ;D

Re: Knightmare Article*

Posted: 22 Jan 2004, 21:38
by MoanaLiza
You're a bloke Motley! You're a bloke ;D!

Re: Knightmare Article*

Posted: 23 Jan 2004, 20:51
by Lord_Bob
Nice to read the apology, don't worry too much about having a bad day, everyone does and what your site is trying to do is a good thing and I as a writer fully understand how you do not want to ruin confidence by over editing.