Knightmare.com

*aka Rachel's bi-annual contribution to the forum

I found this because I am cool and should be working (this is all a complete lie of course, I never feel I should be working):

http://www.crystinkingfish.com/retroshow.htm

it will probably be at a different link when the new issue comes out etc

love, hugs, kisses and glow-in-the-dark stars,

Rachel

some geeky kid wearing the 'Helmet of Truth'...


Morons! Idiots I tell you! And the life force skull wasnt badly animated...

Bah! Who reads those articles anyway?!

That's an insult to KM!  >:(

They can get stuffed for all I care! Just because it was a decent programme...

I think we should make one of their website...

love, hugs, kisses and glow-in-the-dark stars,

Rachel

Right on!  ;D

Hee hee yay for Knightmare fanfiction!

some geeky kid wearing the 'Helmet of Truth'...


Morons! Idiots I tell you! And the life force skull wasnt badly animated...

Bah! Who reads those articles anyway?!

I wouldn't read them.  They're always not true!

tbh I thought that was just a random moan by some1 who writes stuff all day like that and got sick of it and KM happened to be her abuse victim. Load of bs really

I finally read it tonight.

There's a lot of these bitchy review-type websites around now- not sure if this website is all like that, or whether it was just that review. Some of the websites who specialise in that type of humour are really funny. Although this may be the metaphorical pot calling the kettle black, I didn't find the person writing this review even remotely funny.

I agree on the life force skull- it isn't badly animated. One thing that makes such reviews work or not work is whether they pick suitable things to criticise. In this case, I don't think they chose the right target.

for the record, i didn't say it was good.  i said it was a contribution.  the site is run by a uea society, a couple of the people who run it work with me and we were sat next to them at socmart.

Hey. Dear me, that doesn't do us a lot of justice, does it? Phraseology needs a little work. Well, just to make myself feel better about covering KM, and worse for self-advertising, I'm popping the link up for the dooyoo article I wrote at the end of summer 2002.

http://www.dooyoo.co.uk/tv/tv_programs/ ... ew/386618/

This was posted on the main site about a year ago, and got lots of reads, which was absolutely tops - but the link has just withered to the bottom of the pile, and with lots of new forum personae, if anyone would like a read, that'd be grand too.

Love to all,
KaM

I read that review and I thought it was great, I agreed with all of what you said and it was a slightly biased review but then again there wasnt much to insult about KM apart from that other review which was just petty and stupid insulting the contestants, the KM actors careers and the graphics themselves. Nice work KaM!

I Just read that artical !!!  >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(

"Geeky Kids In Helmets"

"Poor Grapics"

"Badly Animated Life-Force" (Ok The Cake was bad but I mean)

I get the distincit impresion that who ever wrote this artical has

a) Never watch Knightmare PROPLEY

b) Is an insulting prat

Honestly if it was SO bad why is it so fondly rememberd by a lot of people

And why oh why was it voted into the Top 100 Kids Tv Shows (At number 14 I might add)



Tell you what I have half a mind to set Grippa & Rhark on them OR better Yet TINY.

Hehehe LOVELY.

The person who wrote that article could have a good future writing for the BNP, the Daily Sport or some such rag...

Tch.

I tell you something Keith, you sure know how to show those idiots in the other article on how to write a decent article is done!  ;D

Is an insulting prat

Skarkill! I have a list of names if you want What are we going to do about it, complain...?  >:(

Why don't we just shut down that site altogether.

Do a riot? Holding picket signs...  ;D

Seeing that there makes me think of how poorly researched this article it, it sounds like some prat who saw an episode of KM years ago and has vague memories of it.