End of seasons
-
I noticed that in 'Who wants to be a Millionaire?' (which has the same situation in that the contestants can be in the hotseat for any length of time and there is only a finite length of time available in a series), the production team always managed to end the series when a contestant ends his time in the hotseat anyway. Why could this not be managed in Knightmare? (In series 1, did the Folly versus Cedric scene actually change anything? I wonder if this was a 'filler', so if the last team did get past the Wall of Jericho, maybe that scene would be left out? Because there would probably not have been time for that quest to be completed if they had the horn and the Folly versus Cedric scene was left in). As for series 7 (when the end of the quest coincided with the end of the season as well), that was needed for plot reasons - the Sly/Romanha scene was a bit of a filler, and the 'return' sequence was longer than with Julie's team winning - again, probably to fill time.
-
You've answered your own question, really - Millionaire can be edited down so that the end always coincides with the end of the series. With Knightmare it's more awkward - they would probably have introduced a "filler" in Series 8 as well had it not been so short.
-
But there may be pauses that can be edited here and there (it says that the first team of series 8 took over half an hour to decide what objects to take in the clue room). Also, does everyone think I am right about the Folly versus Cedric scene being a filler?
-
One assumes that they got more proficient at bringing a series to an end as they went along - the first four seasons or so didn't really end on a satisfactory note so they did something about it (as I said in another topic, the wall of Jericho scenario seemed a bit contrived, one assumes that the team died due simply to low life force, but the way it was presented it seems that they literally died of not having the horn).
It probably wasn't fair to send teams in knowing full well that they wouldn't have time to win - who knows, maybe the teams that ended seasons two, three and four could have gone on to win? They should have at least done a season 8-style Short Cut on them.
When I watched Knightmare as a child, my overriding memory was that, typically, the last team on the series won, and all the rest didn't. I used to think that they re-ordered the teams so that if there were any winners, they'd put them on at the end of the season. Now, having watched it again, I don't think it's true, but the end at least of seasons 6 and 7 were fixed I think.
-
I think, if given the time, the last team on Series 4 would definitely have won.
-
Sending a team out when they had no chance what so ever of succeeding was pointless.
They were better off thowing a few more traps at Dunstan and co rather than having a new team.
-
ooh ooh OHH! i know about this, i know how it was all done.
I e-mailed Tim Child about it a few weeks back cus i've been wondering about this since i watched knightmare as a kid and he told me how it all worked(hes such a helpful guy)
Here's his response:
"Stephen I will answer this one but I can't find time to answer all the queries which come from Knightfans.
All teams which entered the games began with winning team status. If they failed at key points in their quest, they became losing teams. A losing team was not allowed to win - i.e. perform and succeed in the final core task, but a losing team was not necessarily killed off straight away. Some survived longer for entertainment value, and some because their lack of a particular object or spell would not be apparent until they reached the moment of when they needed to use it.
Winding up a series presented special problems. We could not roll a quest across from series to series because the nature of the dungeon and its cast was always revised. When approaching the end of a series with a 'losing' team in Quest, it was relatively easy. You just prolonged their adventure until it became convenient to kill them off. The problem came when the final team was still in 'winning status'. We resolved this in a variety of ways - sometimes providing short cuts; sometimes allowing them to succeed in a sub-task, rather than defeat the dungeon. None of these was really satisfying - but often it was the best I could do, in the cause of maintaining fair play.
There was only one incident when I curtailed a team for any other reason - and that was when one dungeoneer became so homesick he was physically ill. I can't reveal which one or which series, and I don't think you would be able to spot it.If this incident seems odd - remember that we never knew when a Quest was going to end, so there was always another team waiting in back up. This meant that some of the players had been away from home and staying in hotels for up to seven days. Some were only 11, and many had never been away from home before.
best
TC"
Hope this helps
Steve
-
That's interesting - although of all the seasons that I can think of, only season one (and possibly season five, I can't remember but I don't think so) actually ended with someone losing.
As an aside, Tim didn't mention whether the team involved in the "incident" he discussed actually finished a season, I assume it could have been any losing/short-cutting team in the show's entire run.
-
Fascinating stuff! The "assumed winning until they cock it up" principal is very interesting (and quite sensible in my opinion).
I can certainly understand the home-sickness. I remember what it was like going to university for the first time - that was the first time I'd stayed away from my family. I was 19 and it still cut a bit.
Anyway, Tim's perfectly right not to say which team got curtailed and I don't think we should start guessing.
Btw, I would imagine that it would be extremely difficult to pace a live series to finish at the correct time when a more complicated series ending sub-plot is involved. I predict an earlier series-style ending.
-
Btw, I would imagine that it would be extremely difficult to pace a live series to finish at the correct time when a more complicated series ending sub-plot is involved. I predict an earlier series-style ending.
I agree. With it being live there'll probably be quite enough for the production team to think about and rip their hair out over without adding more. I also hope it's the case that they stick with an early-series style finale.
I'm glad to see that so many people are being converted to the cause of the old series endings. It must be like water torture: since I've ranted on and on about how good they are for so long on so many occasions, people are eventually forced to agree.
Now I just need similarly to convince people on other issues, and especially other inclusions for the new KM. Hmmm...
Clifford Norgate as Hordriss. Clifford Norgate as Hordriss. Clifford Norgate as Hordriss. Clifford Norgate as Hordriss. Clifford Norgate as Hordriss. Clifford Norgate as Hordriss. Clifford Norgate as Hordriss. Clifford Norgate as Hordriss. Clifford Norgate as Hordriss. Clifford Norgate as Hordriss.
You get the picture.
-
That's interesting - although of all the seasons that I can think of, only season one (and possibly season five, I can't remember but I don't think so) actually ended with someone losing.
The way i interpret it, we saw the ending team get pulled from the dungeon before getting the chance to finish wheras in reality they have already lost at a key point in a previous dungeon
As i see it, it was a great way to work it
-
Wasn't it sad that the series ended after series 8. At the end, the players were simply pushed out of the way and they only ever got 8 minutes of air-time. Then it was over forever
-
I think end of seasons were fantastic, if the dungeoneer was only midway through the dungeon, such as series 3, for instance, and that bloody good ending with the trombone, and series 5, with the freezing objective. However, for those who were nearly there, they should have shortened the number of rooms down, or provided appropriate short-cuts for retriving objects.
Series 8. however, was too disapointing for an end to a great programme, it should have been more scraier, like for instance, an outside baddie trying to rule the dungeons, and he was so powerful, that Lord Fear and Treaguard had to work together for once to destroy him.
-
by delibratly lessening the rooms you can lessen the challenge and therefore almost say it gives them and unfair advantage. i know difficulty cannot be directly linked to length, but the more rooms you have, mean more chances for guiding errors if nothing else
-
Hi Noucamp! Don't think I've come across you yet. Have an elf twig hands one over
I was quite intersted to hear about the dungeoneer being sick and having to kill them because of that. I'm assuming it was a young one - what say to the process of elimination? We may be able to work it out!
-
Im sure if they knew season 8 was going to be the last they would have had a big finish.
And i don't think being pulled off the quest because its the end of a season was unfair.. it was part of the game the rules and i guess it was luck of the draw.. unless they had some idea as to how much time they had to play with and played a 'fake' team to end things with? Well we know that wasnt the case it the last few seasons but for the 1st part it might have been the case. or they could included a 'short quest' for the last team.
I also felt it was wrong to kill a team off because they did something wrong.. if they where able to get out of it somehow they should have been giving the chance to.
-
I think end of seasons were fantastic, if the dungeoneer was only midway through the dungeon, such as series 3, for instance, and that bloody good ending with the trombone, and series 5, with the freezing objective. However, for those who were nearly there, they should have shortened the number of rooms down, or provided appropriate short-cuts for retriving objects.
This is the way that i see it - lets see who agrees
As a child(and i have mentioned this in other posts) I never really knew or cared that Knightmare was a Game show.
As far as i was concerned the dungeoneer was "killed" by whatever or however it was shown in the show(Eg: being eaten by ariadne) Although their failure in a previous part of the dungeon was usually mentioned as the cause it never occured to me that the team was going to lose from the point of this mistake onwards.
With the "Destroy the dungeon"series ends it was the same way i thougn the team were doing well untill the horn blew - "NOOOOO that team might have made it in the end" would have came to mind but t'was all part of the fun.
The sub quests at certain series end (eg:Freezing the dungeon) when completed also led me to believe that the dungeoneer had "won" as his new objective had been completed and the powers that be reigned supreme.
The game show aspect of Knightmare seems to only really appeal to those who are on the show. the rest of us can be content with sitting back and watching how simon's team were performing well untill they told him to "sidestep right" - their mistake may have been made at that point, or it may have been made earlier. apart from cases where object mischoice is made obvious (series3 team7) we will never know.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login