Re:Forum Concern...
-
One thing needs to be addressed and this is a problem with appointing 'old hands' to the task.
There will always come a time when an arguement will begin between a Knewbie and a regular. It will not neccesarily be the Knewbie's fault and s/he may respond negatively to the .....oh hell. Not explaining this well, example time.
Hypothetically speaking. A thread is started with a Knewbie stating his opinion on a random wall monster. Emii (No offense for using your name Emii but you're the first person that came to mind. Sorry) responds in a sarcastic manner which the Knewbie takes the wrong way and replies with an offensive statement which Emii then replies to and things get put of hand.....
So, you have the Knewbie and Emii. Both are at fault now as both continued the arguement, no one really started it, it was a misunderstanding. Both believe that they have done no wrong as the other started it.
What do you do? A regular like Emii has respect here, the Knewbie hasn't had a chance to get to know anyone. How would Emii react to being warned and potentially banned from the forum by her friends?
It's a difficult situation. I hope all can be unbiased but I can see new moderators from the forum regulars potentially being a new problem.
-
Well Emily wouldn't be banned for doing such a thing anyhow. But the top prority for me is to remain unbiased.
Everyone has equal right to be here, whether you've been here for 5 years, 5 months, 5 weeks or 5 minutes.
I have many good friends within the community (indeed my girlfriend is here!), yet when on the forum, I'd treat everyone with fairness and equality. It is the same situation in the KM chat room, which I am an operator of, you have to view a situation based on the facts presented, not the people involved.
-
Which I hope you can both do. It is unfortunate that it has had to get to this stage in the first place.
If a fair and unbiased outlook on things can be achieved and it helps the forum to return to the friendly community I occasionally used to lurk in then I'm all for it.
Just wanted to raise an issue that could potentially have errrr arisen (can I use two derivitives of 'rise' in one sentence? Oh well I have and I'm sticking to it. Who needs the rules of grammar?)
Best of Luck to you both.
-
You raise a good point, Semtex Jack. In a nutshell, you're talking about bias due to longevity, reputation, peer groups etc.
I try not to be biased. If an issue is brought to my attention, I will look at it as objectively and with as much neutrality as I can. After all, I have promised to do the best job I can - and I work for everyone.
-
Thank you Maelfact. As I say, I hope a situation like this never arises and that everyone can just get on.
Hell if it can work here then there is no reason that the entire world can't live together and in peace......maybe if all the dictators in the world had grown up with Knightmare we wouldn't have problems and wars as we do
Interesting idea for a piece of research....."Does Knightmare produce more free minded and accepting individuals?"
Or maybe not!
-
I've been talking to one of my best mates. He's 16, was born in 1988. He was but 6 when Knightmare vanished from our screens He has grown up in a world with no Knightmare.
This could be a sign of the times. People often say that kids now have shorter attention spans and less intellect than those that were born in the late 70's and early 80's.
Could it be a coincidence that we grew up with an intelligent programme such as Knightmare? I think not!
(Just a note. This is not a serious post and I really mean no offense to anyone)
-
So, you have the Knewbie and Emii. Both are at fault now as both continued the arguement, no one really started it, it was a misunderstanding. Both believe that they have done no wrong as the other started it.
What do you do? A regular like Emii has respect here, the Knewbie hasn't had a chance to get to know anyone. How would Emii react to being warned and potentially banned from the forum by her friends?
As this situation is a dispute over a specific topic (rather than a long term dispute against members) I'd post a termination message and lock the thread.
-
My full support to the Mod Squad!
-
So Kieran & Malefact are now moderators of the looney bin General Discussion forum. Hopefully atleast one of you will be online sometime during the day as I don't think I can stand having another case of 2 nutters loose on the board (not you two).
I would offer you both a glass of champaigne to celebrate, but as I'm skint will a glass of tap water do?
-
I am generally around most times of the dya at the moment, as I am currently working on RPG matters the PC needs me quite a lot! Or rather, I need the PC quite a lot.
Thank you for the tap water, it certainly cannot be any worse than Blackpools water, so it may make a nice change!
-
Although this is steering off-topic, I have to menion that Preston water at my old flat was disgusting, when you had to let 3 litres go by before you could get something you could drink.
Chester water is brilliant, though. Can't fault it.
-
Hereford's water isn't too bad, as long as we don't get too much sun and the water table drops....
Hang on....
Chester! CHESTER!!!!!! Grrrrrrrr!
-
Hey, it wasn't us who knocked you out on penalties! You still had a chance, and you blew it.
Better luck this coming season, eh?
(Football, in case the rest of you were wondering)
-
Congrats to Kieran and Malefact on their 'Promotion'.
Both have their heads reasonably well screwed on and have enough sense between them to serve this community well.
For anyone who may be worried about potential 'cliqueism' my answer is:- 'Don't be...'. Remember that the word 'Community' implies some amount of democracy IE even the moderators can be moderated!
If all us real fans continue doing what we've been doing since the beginning IE "Keep the heid". The whole thing should tick-over just nicely...
-
Going back to FK.....
No. It also wasn't us that fielded an inelligiable player and somehow got away with it.
You should have had six points taken off you for the season just ended, not carried over to next season.
The season when the offense is commited should be the season where the punsihment takes effect. You'd be saying the same if it was the other way around.
-
Eh? What? Since when are Chester gonig to start on -6 points next season? Since when did they field an illegible player? Or did I read something about that, but nothing came of it....still, Burton Albion lost 1 point because of it, so even if your accusation were true, we'd still have won the Conference.
And promoted to League Two...
Still, we don't want any irony here, where an argument starts after congratulating moderators, who would then have to moderate the thread where they are being congratulated.
Oh, the mere thought of it gives me a headache.
-
Actually FK you're wrong on those facts.
Chester finished on 92 points with 85 goals for and 34 against giving a difference of +51
Hereford finished on 91 points with 103 goals for and 44 against giving a difference of +59
If it had been treated fairly and a point had been taken off you when it should have been Hereford would have automatically gained promotion on goal difference, you would have had to make it through the playoffs.
As you say. No arguement here. Just stating facts.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login