Hmmmm...interactive?

[Malefact]

I think a higher maximum would be a little better - 100 words get used up very quickly, particularly if one is struck by inspiration.

[HStorm]

Yeah, like I say, 150 should be about right. And it's not like people are going to use the full limit every time.

[Emii]

150 then. Try not to go over. Any other suggestions, such as no complicated names for magical items or explanations behind them? lol!

[HStorm]

Should there be a limit on how frequently each person can post e.g. no more than once every four entries or something?

[Malefact]

How about just having a rule that you can't reply to yourself?

(If, though, the contributions dry up there may be no alternative. I noticed during the last story that as it got longer and longer, the number of contributions lessened - I would attribute this to the fact that the amount of text that needed to be read before posting was increasing!)

[HStorm]

The worry with the rule only stopping you from making consecutive posts is that it still leaves room for the story to be dominated by two or three people.

[Fidjit]

Good thing I can't get involved in this. Rules again?

[Malefact]

True. A frequency limit might be called for, then.

I don't think we should impose too many rules, though, on something that is just a bit of fun.

[HStorm]

Yeah, I'd agree with that.

[Emii]

Who was imposing rules? I asked for suggestions on how to keep it going, personally. Basically, keep to about 150 words per post and try not to consecutively post.

Who wants to start? Separate thread, methinks...

[HStorm]

Well it was your idea, Emii, I suggest you start it.

[Emii]

Okies