A good Vs Evil topic
-
I'm not sure really if Mogdred had mininions or was just part of the opposition. Fatilla said he worked for old skull face, but I'm not so sure that was Mogdred. Can't really say with Gumboil cos I havn't seen series 2 in 16 years.
When i first saw Lord Fear I thought that he was head of the opposition all the time, but had never revealed himself, after all there had been no spyblasses before.
Also I think it was interesting that one team were offered a magnifying glass by Merlin and he said that it was no ordinary magnifying glass.
It could've been a spyglass, what would it show?
-
No, I doubt it was a spyglass. I remember the dungeoneer at the time suggested it was a con, and I believe him. It might have been a magic glass of some kind, but I doubt it would have been of much use.
The reason why I think Gumboil was probably in Mogdred's employ was because he was always demanding passwords and someone has to assign these things.
And when Fatilla was referring to old skull face it was defnitely Mogdred he meant. Nobody else matched that description at all at the time (unless you're suggesting that one of the skull hauntings or a catacombite was in charge), and Lord Fear hadn't been invented back then. We all like our retro-active explanations for obscurities, but it's not necessary in this case.
-
lol the skull in charge.... well it did show up guarding the quest object..
Mogdred trying to get people to join the dark side was 'evil' enough.. and enjoyment on watching teams die (season 2) and a death in season 4, (something Fear never did!!!!!
As for evil...none of the characters were evil.. there actions may have been 'bad' but no one is going to site there are allow someone to take advantage of them or hurt them in anyway. Fear wanted power,
Doesn't matter of that was a spyglass or not.. there was no way the team could have used it without the eye shield.
-
I'm not sure John Woodnutt had much say in the matter in fact. Tim Child had wanted to get rid of the Merlin/Mogdred scenario for a while as it was too derivative, owed too much to Arthurian legend. I don't think there's any doubt that Lord Fear - or at least SOME kind of new arch-villain - would have been introduced for s5 even if John Woodnutt had been retained.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login