Online episodes
-
I think it all comes down to money.
I'm not sure there's enough money available from pure advertising to pay for Knightmare as a series. If it was available as a subscription service then perhaps that might be possible. But how much would each episode cost to watch? 50p? £1? You still need a lot of paying subscribers to make that viable.
-
No.
The Geek week episode was about 25 minutes long and it took me about 45 minutes to watch. Internet connections are just not good enough around here. I also don't want to watch it on a smallish laptop screen, a decent full size tv without having to buffer or break connection is vital.
-
Oooch, wombstar
Personally, I'd be happy with an online series; didn't Mark Knight suggest something similar a couple of weeks ago?
-
Another possibility, of course, is that a company may gain benefit from the show in other respects.
For example, Google gains benefit from the GeekWeek episode by raising Google's profile and encouraging people to come and see YouTube.
Similarly, the NetFlix shows may not cover their own costs. But if they act as a loss leader for people to sign up to NetFlix, then it makes money for the company in other ways.
All in all, it's very hard to say.
-
I didn't consider an internet only KM when I wrote my 'revisited' article but I'm not sure the market/technology is mature enough to support it. That said, KM was always at the cutting edge...
House of Cards was a massive, expensive gamble for Netflix and it had a huge US audience to try to make its investment back. I'm not sure someone would be willing to take that sort of risk on KM, an old British children's show.
House of Cards was also riddled with product placement - what will no doubt become the advertising method of internet broadcasts with no ad breaks - and we don't want KM ruined with branded clue room objects!
Also, being able to watch the whole series in one go - won't that spoil the weekly anticipation?
I suspect TV is still the way forward, but I'm certainly no expert. Internet would be better than nothing!
-
On the subject of 'all comes down to money', well, that's about ninety-nine per cent of the struggle on any route.
The interesting thing with Netflix itself is that a subscription for unlimited access is just £6 per month. No PPV fee at all. They have a vast library of shows of course, and I doubt they would want to invest in a hi-tech gameshow, but it does show that, depending on the service provider, it doesn't have to cost a hydrogen bomb.
Wombstar, it doesn't necessarily have to be live streaming. BBC iPlayer, for instance, allows you to download a show and keep the recording for a limited time, after which the recording becomes encrypted and unwatchable. Episodes of KM could be downloadable, and allow you to watch them within a fixed time limit - say, three weeks.
-
In fact, I'm going to take back what I said about advertising, since it only really applied to YouTube adverts.
If you could run TV-style adverts, to a guaranteed audience of a few million, I think you could easily get sufficient advertising for Knightmare as an online show.
-
Yes I think it Knightmare could work online. Like Alan said you would need a lot of paying subscribers but I believe the audience is there. Of course I would prefer to see Knightmare on TV where it belongs but the online option would be the next best thing.
I don't believe the audience is there... yet.
As of right now, the Geek Week episode has been viewed just over 400,000 times in ten days. If we consider that we don't know how many of these views were simply partial, or how many were repeated views by fans or people who enjoyed it, it's clear we're still a long way from 1,000,000 proven avid Knightmare fans willing to pay for access to the series right now, especially since access to the YouTube episode is completely free for everybody.
Knightmare definitely has the potential to gain in popularity by reaching out to a worldwide audience, but we need an actual television program in order to do that. Within a season or two, and depending on how many countries the show can be exported to, Knightmare should have little difficulty in gaining a large enough installed fan-base to ensure the success of such an online venture.
The question then becomes, if we already have a Knightmare television series, what is to be gained by moving it over to YouTube or other streaming service?
If Knightmare is being televised, the broadcaster's own catch-up or on-demand streaming service would cover the online-access feature. The only real benefit would be that in the event the series is once again cancelled, online would always be a possibility and the show could simply relocate at that point with it's fan-base intact.
-
I didn't consider an internet only KM when I wrote my 'revisited' article but I'm not sure the market/technology is mature enough to support it. That said, KM was always at the cutting edge...
Knightmare being on the cutting edge back in the day is a well established fact, yet I don't see it as being the reason why it was so popular. Being cutting edge was enough to grab people's attention and generate media attention, but it was the entertainment value of the show itself that sustained the audience if managed to attract.
That was in the days before widespread online access. Even if Knightmare is no longer cutting edge, if it's a good enough show (which we all know it's capable of being) it will still generate a sizable audience of new fans who spread word of the joy via the magic of social networking and the internet.
Being "cutting edge" was a string to Knightmare's bow, but it wasn't the bow itself. We have Tim Child, Hugo Myatt, Mark Knight and all the other brilliant individuals involved to thank for that, not just the processing power of a computer
-
I wasn't suggesting that being cutting edge was the reason KM was popular (though it helped it stand out) but rather that Tim Child, who has been described as an innovator (by Dave Morris, possibly others), probably wouldn't shy away from a new method of distribution even if unproven.
-
I wasn't suggesting that being cutting edge was the reason KM was popular (though it helped it stand out) but rather that Tim Child, who has been described as an innovator (by Dave Morris, possibly others), probably wouldn't shy away from a new method of distribution even if unproven.
Seems I misunderstood the gist of your post after the point you said "cutting edge". You're absolutely right there - though now you mention it I'd say mere online streaming might not quite be innovative enough for Knightmare, even though it would be nice. I wonder if an innovative and new way of using the internet in new Knightmare episodes can be found - but if anyone can do it, Tim Child can
-
Downloading isn't really an option for us, it would take at least an hour if connection is ok.
And most shows on tv are online anyway, so why not broadcast it on tv and have a catch up function? pretty much every channel does it, and you can watch live tv via the net anyway.
Another fear is it being picked up by a sky channel, don't have sky.
There is a possibility the bbc picking it up I guess, and giving it a prime time slot on a Friday evening or something? For the bbc it would be a cheap show and license fee put to good use. lol plus out of all the online streaming serves iplayer works the best.. in the middle of the night at least
-
I don't think it's a cheap show for the BBC either.
-
[Some posts that added nothing to this discussion have been deleted and taken offline]
-
Given that the BBC has an annual income if £3.5 billion from the licence fee it is stating the obvious to say it could afford to produce KM if it didn't produce other things. But let's not lose sight of the fact that the BBC is a public service and what it chooses to produce is based on an extremely complicated range of factors designed to ensure value for money for the licence fee payer is maximised. Each slot on each channel is carefully planned to reach particular age groups, socio-economic groups etc. It has to balance each of its three core purposes of entertaining, educating and informing. Making a profit is not a consideration.
Thinking about a BBC KM, we should think about similar shows which target similar audiences. I've said before that the BBC One Sat night fantasy, family slot might work - think Dr Who. Merlin...
These are v expensive shows however and are co funded by the BBCs commercial arm. BBC Worldwide is prepared to invest in such productions because they make a lot of money overseas, especially in America.
KM could be such a brand with the right support but, frankly, its a long shot.
But just because the BBC has cash don't assume it fan spend money on whatever it likes - it is subject to a robust regulatory framework and strict public service targets/objectives.
For what its worth I personally think KM, being a cerebral show with family appeal, could fit into that framework somewhere.
-
Given that the BBC has an annual income if £3.5 billion from the licence fee it is stating the obvious to say it could afford to produce KM if it didn't produce other things. But let's not lose sight of the fact that the BBC is a public service and what it chooses to produce is based on an extremely complicated range of factors designed to ensure value for money for the licence fee payer is maximised. Each slot on each channel is carefully planned to reach particular age groups, socio-economic groups etc. It has to balance each of its three core purposes of entertaining, educating and informing. Making a profit is not a consideration.
Thinking about a BBC KM, we should think about similar shows which target similar audiences. I've said before that the BBC One Sat night fantasy, family slot might work - think Dr Who. Merlin...
These are v expensive shows however and are co funded by the BBCs commercial arm. BBC Worldwide is prepared to invest in such productions because they make a lot of money overseas, especially in America.
KM could be such a brand with the right support but, frankly, its a long shot.
But just because the BBC has cash don't assume it fan spend money on whatever it likes - it is subject to a robust regulatory framework and strict public service targets/objectives.
For what its worth I personally think KM, being a cerebral show with family appeal, could fit into that framework somewhere.
Nice summary, as always, Mr HobGoblin
I'd be inclined to agree that the "BBC One Sat night fantasy, family slot" as you've called it, might work. The only thing I'd note is that the shows that usually occupy this slot would appear to be pure dramatisations versus the gameshow/dramatisation hybrid that is Knightmare. Additionally, do you think that Knightmare lends itself to overseas sales? Personally, I'm struggling to see the US networks accepting a UK gameshow showing British people. Furthermore, would Knightmare survive dubbing in the same way that, e.g. Merlin might?
I'm sure there's an article in there somewhere
Oh! Oh! Someone should try dubbing Chevalier!
-
I'd be inclined to agree that the "BBC One Sat night fantasy, family slot" as you've called it, might work. The only thing I'd note is that the shows that usually occupy this slot would appear to be pure dramatisations versus the gameshow/dramatisation hybrid that is Knightmare.
Mind you, gameshows and quizzes of various kinds are also a major element of BBC1's Saturday evening schedule, so a programme that appeals to the gameshow audience AND the fantasy audience could sit fairly comfortably there...
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login