New Articles Needed: Site and Forum now Linked
-
In the last month I've seen two tweets about new articles on Knightmare.com, but the links have led to 404 errors. Are the articles supposed to be visible, or were the tweets premature?
http://twitter.com/Knightmare_CITV/status/406775674121498624
http://twitter.com/Knightmare_CITV/status/417454271131840512
-
The Lee Gunnell article was deleted after it received complaints.
The other one I'm less sure about, but I suspect it's since been reclassified, moved, or deleted. I don't think there's any way to update a tweet with revised addresses once it's been made.
-
The other one I'm less sure about, but I suspect it's since been reclassified, moved, or deleted. I don't think there's any way to update a tweet with revised addresses once it's been made.
This was due to a clerical error when I submitted the article. I became aware of this almost immediately, and unpublished the article so that further work could be done on it, but I was too late to stop the automatic tweet having been triggered. With any luck the article will be published properly before the end of the day, given that it's a look back at the past year.
-
Unless you're a fan of paedophile jokes, you haven't missed much.
-
Unless you're a fan of paedophile jokes, you haven't missed much.
No wonder it got deleted if that was why. Don't need garbage like that.
On a positive note, good work on the 2013 review David! For me 2013 has been the best year Knightmare has had since Knightmare ceased broadcasting.
-
Thank you for the positive comments about my 2013 review. I felt it would reflect poorly on Knightmare.com not to have one, so I'm glad it's been received well.
No wonder it got deleted if that was why. Don't need garbage like that.
Each time I've seen Knightmare Live, one of the advisors has tried to make a joke along these lines (e.g. Yewtree). And each time, Paul Flannery/Treguard has been quick to condemn them for "lazy comedy"!
-
I actually stumbled on this article a few months ago by googling knightmare and looking through many pages of results. Questionable 'jokes' aside it's pretty offensive to fans of the show - despite a 'too little, too late' claim to the contrary, the writer obviously isn't particularly keen on the programme.
I cannot believe he ever thought it would be suitable material for this site!
-
I'd just like to add my compliments to and say that I thought Drassil's 2013 article was very well researched and written.
It was engaging informative and brilliant summation of Knightmare in 2013 and everything that had happened within the fandom of KM in 2013.
It was a fantastic bite sized crash course for someone like me who was getting back into the fandom on what they had missed in the previous year.
Well done mate.
-
Thanks for the tip, Chris: I've now read the deleted article in the author's blog. I find the tone slightly menacing and I'm sad that it was ever published on Knightmare.com. My compliments to whoever raised concerns about it.
And thank you, Ricky, for such high praise of my 2013 article. I'm not sure I'd have believed what a remarkable year 2013 was for Knightmare if I hadn't written it all out!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login